State v. Arciaga-Bucio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “multiple-victim rule” was “within the judicial branch’s authority and does not violate separation-of-powers principles”
• concluding that several offenses committed within a 30-minute period were not part of the same course of conduct because they were motivated by different criminal objectives
• stating that legislature did not intend to immunize offenders from consequences of separate crimes against separate victims. (quotations omitted)
• \A sentence is unauthorized if it is contrary to law or applicable statutes.\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).