State v. Archie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that determination of conditions of probation is a judicial function which cannot be delegated to an executive agency such a department of probation and striking legislative act purporting to do so as violation of separation of powers
• finding that an appellate court will not disturb a decision to revoke probation unless the decision was influenced by an error of law, was without evidentiary support, or constituted an abuse of discretion
• stating this court will not disturb a decision to revoke probation unless the decision was influenced by an error of law, was without evidentiary support, or constituted an abuse of discretion
• the appellate court “will not disturb the circuit court's decision to revoke probation unless the decision was influenced by an error of law, was without evidentiary support, or constituted an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 77×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-21· cited 38×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 35×
• Tant v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-05-28· cited 6×
• State v. Stevens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-04· cited 4×
• State v. Knapp
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams Ex Rel. G.A.L. v. Bordon's, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-07· cited 26×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-10-31· cited 23×
• State v. De La Cruz
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-06-18· cited 13×