Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/28/2025

State v. Arce

Citations

2025 Ohio 1091

Syllabus

Osowik - Trial court did not err in granting appellee's motion to suppress. Under the totality of the circumstances, appellee's consent to search his motor vehicle was not knowingly given, due to appellee's English language barrier. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
Bumper v. North Carolina
Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
State v. Burnside
Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
State v. Robinette
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
State v. Posey
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 168×
United States v. Zapata
Eleventh Circuit· 1999-07-13· cited 142×
United States v. Zubia-Melendez
Tenth Circuit· 2001-08-24· cited 87×
United States v. Jose B. Bueno
Sixth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 62×
United States v. Eugenio Alvarado, Oscar Abelenda and Roniel Marcos Medina
Fifth Circuit· 1990-04-06· cited 39×
State v. Rodriguez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-14· cited 6×
State v. Guerrero-Sanchez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-13· cited 5×
United States v. Acosta-Tapia
Ninth Circuit· 2003-07-10· cited 2×
State v. Casi
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-22· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.