State v. Arcand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that jail credit should be applied only to the first of consecutive sentences”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that he was entitled to credit “against each sentence imposed” and stating “[w]hen [a] balance is consumed, nothing remains”
• considering defendant’s motion under North Dakota’s criminal rule, Rule 35(a), arguing that he should have received credit for 49 days spent in custody “as a result of the criminal charge for which the sentence was imposed” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).