State v. Approximately $2,000,000.00 in United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding state court retained in rem jurisdiction despite non-suit of State’s forfeiture claims because alleged property owner’s claims for affirmative relief remained pending
• “The transfer of the currency to [federal government] was improper and as such did not divest the trial court of its jurisdiction to . . . provide for the disposition of the currency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).