State v. Angel A.
Citations
- 235 Conn. App. 635
Syllabus
Convicted, following a jury trial, of attempt to commit murder and other crimes, the defendant appealed. He claimed, inter alia, that the trial court violated his right to jury unanimity by discharging the jury after accepting its verdict but before disclosing to the parties that one of the jurors had made an ex parte comment to the court in the deliberation room that she felt ''a little guilty about the attempted murder charge.'' Held: The defendant's unpreserved claim that the trial court violated his right to jury unanimity failed under the third prong of State v. Golding (213 Conn. 233), as the juror's comment was simply a statement about how she felt about the verdict that could not reasonably be construed as an equivocation or expression of reservation about it and did not indicate that she or any other juror had not agreed to the verdict, and, because this court could not infer that the juror intended her comment to inform the trial court that the jury's verdict was not unanimous, that court's failure to disclose the comment to the parties before discharging the jury did not amount to a constitu- tional violation. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by conducting a limited inquiry during a posttrial hearing about the juror's comment and denying the defen- dant's request to inquire into why she made that comment, as the court's actions did not deprive the defendant of his right to a fair trial but, rather, satisfied the preliminary inquiry into possible juror misconduct required under State v. Brown (235 Conn. 502), the juror having affirmed her verdict and the court, on the basis of the juror's testimony, having determined that there was no indication that the jury's verdict lacked unanimity or that juror misconduct had occurred, and further questioning of the juror would have constituted improper inquiry into the mental processes by which the verdict was determined. (One judge concurring and one judge dissenting in separate opinions) Argued February
Judges: Moll; Westbrook; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 1,013×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- Miller-Bates v. Wachovia BankSupreme Court· 2005-10-03· cited 207×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-19· cited 163×
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 74×
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-11· cited 71×
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-23· cited 69×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-05· cited 62×
- United States v. JeffersonFifth Circuit· 2001-07-16· cited 61×
- Josephson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-22· cited 52×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-11· cited 52×
- United States v. Maria Asuncion Martinez De Hernandez, Baldomero Hernandez-Gonzales, Carmen Perea, Carlos Perea, Salvador Pineda-VergaraTenth Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 38×
- State v. GarySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-19· cited 34×
- United States v. Sangeeta MannEighth Circuit· 2012-07-17· cited 25×
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-14· cited 25×
- Otto v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-04-13· cited 19×
- State v. DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-06· cited 17×
- State v. KamelConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-30· cited 11×
- State v. J.r.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-14· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.