Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/19/2019
State v. Andrews
Citations
- 830 S.E.2d 12
- 427 S.C. 178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a]lthough lustful disposition is not one of the purposes specifically set out in OCGA § 24-4-404 (b) for the admission of other acts, OCGA § 24-4-413 provides an exception to the general rule in sexual assault cases and allows the admission of propensity evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CurrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-04· cited 69×
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 43×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 38×
- State v. Elvin Cervantes-PavonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-27· cited 19×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-07-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.