State v. Andrews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he defendant’s attempt to isolate certain comments by the court is unavailing because those comments must be evaluated in fight of the entire charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. MARCELINO S.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-29· cited 17×
• State v. Adorno
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-08· cited 12×
• State v. Crespo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-05-12· cited 9×
• State v. Gauthier
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-01-01· cited 6×
• State of Connecticut v. Hall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-02· cited 4×
• State v. Andrews
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-12
• State v. Peeples
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• State v. Hedge
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-02-14· cited 11×
• State v. Little
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-05-03· cited 11×
• State v. Griffin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-26· cited 5×
• State v. Hamilton
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-29· cited 3×