Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/15/2011
State v. Andersen
Citations
- 31 A.3d 385
- 132 Conn. App. 125
- 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[b]ecause the prior misconduct involved the same victim, there was no issue as to whether it was commit- ted upon a person similar to the prosecuting witness’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruendel, Alvord, Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HickeyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-05-15· cited 12×
- State v. Donald H. G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-02-25· cited 9×
- State v. FrancioneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-06-19· cited 8×
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-30· cited 5×
- State v. NicholsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-06-18
- State v. Daren S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-11-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.