State v. Anaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts apply the same 18 federal qualified immunity analysis for claims of common law qualified immunity
• “strongly stated policy does not justify our reading into this criminal statute provisions that are not there”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Marking
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-21· cited 31×
• State v. Schultz
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 29×
• State v. Schultz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-23· cited 7×
• State v. Schultz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-01· cited 5×
• State v. Azpitarte
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-24· cited 3×
• State Of Washington v. Wendy Granath
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-07-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Stillwell-Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
• In Re the Marriage of Kovacs
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-07-08· cited 222×
• Cox v. Helenius
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-02-04· cited 184×
• Duke v. Boyd
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-08-21· cited 137×
• Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin County
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 133×
• Monroe v. Soliz
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 60×
• Riksem v. City of Seattle
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-23· cited 30×
• Jacques v. Sharp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-09· cited 22×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-16· cited 15×