State v. Amsden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering Lund, 475 A.2d at 1060, and stating that it was “obvious that [the court] considered [the defendant’s] ‘outburst’ to be the sort of ‘tumultuous behavior’ contemplated by the statute”
• defining tumultuous, in part, as “violently agitated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).