State v. Ames

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly allowed a challenge to a juror before the jury was complete because “[tjhe cause shown was sufficient, the state had come into possession of new evidence bearing upon the juror’s suitability, [and] the defendant was not prejudiced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1906-03-09· cited 43×
• State v. Lupino
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-06-12· cited 27×
• State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-06-24· cited 14×
• Schoeb v. Cowles
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-03-01· cited 10×
• Hjelm v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1908-08-07· cited 9×
• Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1928-04-20· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wallace v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-11-25· cited 37×
• Murray v. Board of County Commissioners
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-11-14· cited 34×
• State ex rel. Douglas v. Ritt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-06-09· cited 29×
• State v. Burlingame
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1898-11-21· cited 25×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1902-06-13· cited 16×
• United States v. Scott
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1895-10-07· cited 15×
• State v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1898-12-02· cited 11×
• State v. Clements
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-02-13· cited 10×
• State v. Jamison
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1900-01-25· cited 9×
• Bliss v. United States
  First Circuit· 1900-12-19· cited 7×
• State v. Cody
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-06-16· cited 6×