State v. American Sugar Refining Co.
Citations
- 108 La. 603
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. In order'that there should be res judicata, the thing demanded and the cause of action must be the same; and they are not the same in two suits for the licenses of different years.</p> <p>2. In a suit under a statute imposing a license on refiners of sugar eo nomine, the defense being that a refiner of sugar is a manufacturer and as such exempt from license taxation, and that as a consequence the statute imposing the license is inconsistent with the Constitution, and there being no question as to what constitutes a refiner of sugar, the process of refining sugar being the same in all refineries, the sole matter involved is the ascertainment of the meaning of the word manufacturer as used by the Constitution; that is to say, a matter of interpretation of the Constitution — a question purely of law.</p> <p>3. A sugar refiner is a manufacturer, and as such exempt from license taxation under the Constitution.</p>
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burguieres v. PollingueSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-02-25· cited 286×
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 216×
- JMCB, LLC v. Bd. of CommerceM.D. Louisiana· 2018-08-23· cited 106×
- Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1954-07-02· cited 63×
- California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1958-02-06· cited 63×
- Sliman v. McBeeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-03-31· cited 62×
- Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1974-04-29· cited 53×
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1902-11-17· cited 44×
- Quinette v. DelhommerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1965-06-07· cited 41×
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-02-14· cited 36×
- New Orleans Firefighters Ass'n Local 632 v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-11-06· cited 34×
- State v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court· 1964-07-10· cited 31×
- Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. PalermoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-06-27· cited 23×
- Kentucky Electric Co. v. BuechelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-02-08· cited 23×
- City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1921-12-02· cited 23×
- H. H. Kohlsaat & Co. v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court· 1912-10-26· cited 20×
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1959-06-25· cited 18×
- In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.E.D. Kentucky· 1913-06-16· cited 17×
- Ryan v. Grandison TrustSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-04-06· cited 16×
- BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BURAS LEVEE DIST. v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 1937-07-03· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court· 1897-03-22· cited 802×
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court· 1895-01-21· cited 312×
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 227×
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 107×
- Ogle v. LeeSupreme Court· 1804-02-22· cited 50×
- Carlin v. Western Assurance Co. of Toronto, CanadaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1882-02-03· cited 41×
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Supreme Court· 1889-11-07· cited 28×
- City of New Orleans v. Ernst & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1883-05-15· cited 22×
- State ex rel. Browne v. A. W. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1899-05-29· cited 15×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FulghamSupreme Court of Alabama· 1890-11-15· cited 14×
- Mercantile Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. LanderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio· 1901-05-29· cited 12×
- United States v. HathawaySupreme Court· 1867-02-18· cited 8×
- Union Sugar Refinery v. MatthiessonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1865-11-14· cited 5×
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee· 1897-02-05· cited 5×
- Coxe v. PenningtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania· 1803-04-15· cited 1×
Other cases named State v. American Sugar Refining Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.