Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/29/2010

State v. Alvarez

Citations

246 P.3d 26
240 Or. App. 167
2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a wound that required four staples to close on the victim’s scalp and the resulting scar which was visible five months after the injury qualified as a “serious and protracted disfigure- ment” under ORS 161.015(8)
looking to indictment to discern which alternative form of unauthorized use of a weapon is at issue under ORS 166.330(l)(a)—i.e., carrying or possessing a dangerous weapon, not attempting to use
reaching the same conclusion and explaining that “[i]t is possible to inflict * * * physical injury with a dangerous or deadly weapon without either possessing or carrying it”
“[O]nce we rely on the indictment to determine which of the alternative forms of the crime are at issue, we disregard particular facts alleged in the indictment or proved at trial” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.