Court of Appeals of Kansas· 5/24/1991
State v. Almond
Citations
- 811 P.2d 529
- 15 Kan. App. 2d 585
- 1991 Kan. App. LEXIS 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer was certified as an operator but had not read the manufacturer’s directions for the Intoxilyzer 5000, no abuse of discretion in holding the machine was operated correctly
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Rees, Brazil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-11-19· cited 67×
- Hemphill v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 24×
- City of Overland Park v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-10-29· cited 22×
- State v. RohrCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-07-22· cited 11×
- State v. VanekCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-18· cited 11×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- State v. DoileSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-03-03· cited 45×
- State v. LieuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-11-22· cited 21×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-06-10· cited 21×
- City of Shawnee v. GrussCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-03-24· cited 17×
- State v. LeroyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-12-21· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.