Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/19/2021

State v. Almeyda

Citations

2021 Ohio 451

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for violating a protection order was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The victim's testimony alone was sufficient to establish the violation. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
State v. McKnight
Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 390×
State v. Hammad
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-22· cited 26×
State v. Putman-Albright
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-29· cited 5×
State v. Hunt
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-05· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.