Skip to main content

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 488

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its analysis of the sentencing factors set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 when it sentenced appellant to an aggregate prison term of 30 months. Thus, appellant cannot demonstrate that his sentence was clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Additionally, the trial court did not err when it imposed consecutive sentences, because the record supported the trial court's conclusion that appellant's history of criminal conduct demonstrated that consecutive sentences were necessary to protect the public from future crime by him. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.