Skip to main content

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 565 N.W.2d 333
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 178
  • 1997 WL 331960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the psychologists’ testimony about the “effects of [a witness’s] mental condition on her ability to tell the truth” was permissible to “help the jury understand the evidence it heard about [her] mental illnesses”
  • holding expert witnesses “may express opinions on matters explaining the pertinent mental and physical symptoms of the victims of abuse” if expert testified about the effects of the victim’s mental condition on her ability to tell the truth
  • explaining statute may be unconstitutional if it reaches “substantial amount of protected conduct” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining statute does not reach relationships “involving the informal exchange of advice[]”
  • explaining statute does not reach relationships “involving the informal exchange of advice[]”
  • explaining statute does not reach relationships “involving the informal exchange of advice[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.