State v. Alexis
Citations
- 89 Wash. 492
- 154 P. 810
- 1916 Wash. LEXIS 715
Syllabus
<p>Indians — Treaties—Curtailment oe Police Powers oe State. Congress, in making provisions by an Indian treaty for fishing rights of the Indians of a territory, could not do so at the expense of the police power of the future state, notwithstanding that the Indians were more or less dependent upon the fish for subsistence (Holcomb, J., dissenting).</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the same under the Stevens Treaty with the Lummi Tribe in Puget Sound
- holding the same under the Stevens Treaty with the Lummi Tribe in Puget Sound
- holding the same under the Stevens Treaty with the Lummi Tribe in Puget Sound
- holding the same under the Stevens Treaty with the Lummi Tribe in Puget Sound
- holding the same under the Stevens Treaty with the Lummi Tribe in Puget Sound
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SatiacumWashington Supreme Court· 1957-07-01· cited 20×
- United States v. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2016-06-27· cited 3×
- United States v. State of WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2016-06-27· cited 2×
- State v. SattacumWashington Supreme Court· 1957-07-01· cited 1×
- United States v. State of WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2017-03-02
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.