Skip to main content

State v. Alexander

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1080

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Appellant filed the motion the morning of the sentencing hearing, which was almost seven months after the plea hearing, he did not have any defense to the offenses, and he appeared to simply have had a change of heart. The trial court did not err in refusing to give jail-time credit to appellant for time that accrued while he was incarcerated on a previous, unrelated conviction. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.