Skip to main content

State v. Alexander

Citations

  • 595 A.2d 282
  • 157 Vt. 60
  • 1991 Vt. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that not all subsequent crimes will act as intervening circumstances, only ones sufficiently “serious” to be “distinct”
  • reasoning that not all subsequent crimes will act as intervening circumstances, only ones sufficiently “serious” to be “distinct”
  • noting fact that police caused challenged “stop in a ‘but for’ sense is not sufficient to require suppression of the fruits of the stop”
  • not all intervening crimes will remove the taint of an illegal stop, only ones sufficiently serious to be “distinct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Morse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.