District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/13/2002
State v. Alexander
Citations
- 831 So. 2d 1252
- 2002 WL 31778057
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Rule 3.190 requires that a motion to dismiss be in writing. Accordingly, it was improper for the trial court to dismiss the charges against Alexander.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ReedyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-14· cited 5×
- State v. SuazoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-15· cited 4×
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. A. J.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-14
- State v. A.J.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-14
- The State of Florida v. Andre AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-25
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.