State v. Alexander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• aggravated robbery ultimate charge because \object of the episode was to rob the victim\ and aggravated assault was \simply ancillary\
• aggravated robbery ultimate offense where “[t]he object of the episode was to rob the victim”; burglary, theft, and aggravated assault “simply ancillary”
• “The ultimate crime will usually be the primary object of the episode, and it will usually be the most serious crime committed on a given occasion.”
• “we find that there was no time lapse between the entry and the robbery and that the burglary and the robbery were therefore but two crimes emanating from a single act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-05-30· cited 32×
• State v. Cornish
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-06-17· cited 28×
• State v. Eagle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-26· cited 19×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-06-13· cited 14×
• State v. Hummert
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-07-26· cited 11×
• State v. Sepahi
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-01-28· cited 8×
• State v. Harper
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-04· cited 2×
• State v. Denman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-26· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. Laki David Price
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-05-30
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gordon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 105×
• State v. Dugan
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-10· cited 58×
• State v. Sheaves
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-24· cited 22×
• State v. Browning
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-06-22· cited 4×