State v. Alejo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an applicant for expungement must wait the period required by statute between the completion of the sentence or probation and the filing of the motion
• holding that the defendants prematurely filed their motions to expunge when they did so before ten years had elapsed after the completion of probation they received for felony charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rubano v. DiCenzo
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-09-25· cited 62×
• State v. Briggs
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-11-16· cited 23×
• State v. Doris E. Poulin
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-05-02· cited 19×
• State v. Badessa
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-03-01· cited 14×
• United States v. Stevens
  D. Maine· 2009-02-19· cited 3×
• State v. Patterson, N3-2002-0362a (2002)
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2002-11-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. Pastore
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-01-12· cited 20×
• State v. Quattrocchi
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-12-19· cited 7×
• State v. Gervais
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1992-05-14· cited 3×
• State v. Foster
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-10-23· cited 1×