Skip to main content

State v. Alberto

Citations

  • 847 So. 2d 1091
  • 2003 WL 21396013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where offenses are pending for sentencing at the same time as the primary offense, those offenses are considered “additional” offenses even if they also meet the definition of “prior record” under rule 3.704(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.