State v. Ake
Citations
- 41 Tex. 166
Syllabus
<p>Bail-bond securities.—The securities on a bail bond or recognizance cannot be heard to avoid their liability on account of a defect in the indictment against their principal; and when the bond is conditioned for the appearance of the principal “ to answer and await the action, &c., and stand trial upon such bill of indictment as may be' preferred against him for swindling,” the sureties cannot avoid liability, though tlie indictment for swindling returned by the grand jury was so defective that no conviction for swindling could be allowed.</p>
Judges: Devine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1884-02-13· cited 10×
- United States v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court· 1887-01-15· cited 10×
- United States v. DavenportW.D. Texas· 1920-06-05· cited 10×
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1886-06-23· cited 1×
- Smalley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- J. D. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1884-05-21
- United States v. Pacheco GarcíaD. Puerto Rico· 1909-08-09
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.