State v. Aiken
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3503
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress, where the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest appellant for operating his vehicle under the influence of alcohol based upon appellant's erratic driving, the odor of alcohol coming from appellant's person, appellant's glossy eyes, and appellant's failure to successfully complete properly administered field sobriety tests.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court· 2000-08-16· cited 535×
- State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-04· cited 147×
- State v. WessonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-10-23· cited 129×
- State v. CodeluppiOhio Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 110×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-18· cited 8×
- State v. TenneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. MasinOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.