State v. Ahern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of two tuning forks provided sufficient assurance that the tuning forks themselves were accurate because each tuning fork corroborated the accuracy of the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Goupil
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-10-12· cited 10×
• Myatt v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-10-09· cited 8×
• State v. Cochrane
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-04-26· cited 8×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-07-03· cited 5×
• State v. Caswell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-04· cited 5×
• Massaro v. Carter
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-09-08· cited 2×
• Village of Algonquin v. Sato
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-07-27· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lonegan v. State
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-08-21· cited 20×
• State v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1960-02-29· cited 15×
• State v. Wojtkowiak
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-06-19· cited 14×
• State v. Kramer
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-01-06· cited 12×
• State v. Underwood
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-10-30· cited 7×
• State v. Wojtkowiak
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-08-02· cited 6×
• State v. Readding
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-05-31· cited 6×
• State v. Buckingham
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-05-07· cited 6×
• State v. Blaney
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-11· cited 4×
• Stevens v. Town of Rye
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-07-14· cited 2×