State v. Aguinaldo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \fruits of an `unlawful seizure' are `proper subjects of a suppression order'\ (quoting State v. Powell, 61 Haw. 316, 320, 603 P.2d 143, 147 (1979))
• noting that “fruits of an ‘unlawful seizure’ are ‘proper subjects of a suppression order’ ” (quoting State v. Powell, 61 Haw. 316, 320, 603 P.2d 143, 147 (1979))
• apparently accepting appellant’s stipulation that stop at intoxication control roadblock was constitutionally valid
• apparently accepting appellant's stipulation that stop at intoxication control roadblock was constitutionally valid
• “A person to whom a statute may be constitutionally applied cannot challenge the statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others.”
• \We ... hold that the police has the power and authority to demand from the driver of a vehicle the production of both [a driver's license and proof of insurance] whenever the vehicle is validly stopped.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).