State v. Afolabi
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2196
Syllabus
SENTENCING: The trial court did not err in imposing a maximum sentence where the court considered the presentence-investigation report, the victim's statement, the facts of the case, and the mitigation evidence, and engaged in a clear analysis of the sentencing factors. The trial court did not err in classifying the defendant as a Tier I sex offender because R.C. 2950.01(E)(1)(C) required the court to classify based on the offense of conviction, and the court imposed the classification mandated by the statute.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.