Skip to main content
· 6/5/2019

State v. Afolabi

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2196

Syllabus

SENTENCING: The trial court did not err in imposing a maximum sentence where the court considered the presentence-investigation report, the victim's statement, the facts of the case, and the mitigation evidence, and engaged in a clear analysis of the sentencing factors. The trial court did not err in classifying the defendant as a Tier I sex offender because R.C. 2950.01(E)(1)(C) required the court to classify based on the offense of conviction, and the court imposed the classification mandated by the statute.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.