State v. Adrian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It should be emphasized that the offense of kidnapping with intent to commit rape can be established without proof of a subsequent rape where the circumstances indicate an intention to rape.”
• \It should be emphasized that the offense of kidnapping with intent to commit rape can be established without proof of a subsequent rape where the circumstances indicate an intention to rape.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Atwood
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
• State v. Sutton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-23· cited 8×
• State v. Bernal
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-08-21· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dessureault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
• State v. Harvill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-16· cited 126×
• State v. Acosta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-13· cited 46×
• Hash v. State of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1936-06-29· cited 41×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-20· cited 18×
• State v. Holliday
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-10-18· cited 15×
• State v. Carter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1947-06-16· cited 13×
• State v. Spillman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-04-16· cited 7×