State v. Adeshina
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3654
Syllabus
By entering a guilty plea, appellant waived his right to challenge the trial court's ruling on his motion to suppress. The State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erroneously imposed a mandatory five-year term of post-release control for appellant's fifth-degree-felony offense of attempt to commit gross sexual imposition. However, the trial court did not err by failing to address certain discretionary fines at sentencing the omission of any reference to the fines at the sentencing hearing and in the judgment entry simply indicated that no fine was imposed. Judgment reversed only as to post-release control and remanded to impose the appropriate term of post-release control. In all other respects, judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.