State v. Adem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “[d]iscovery sanctions are appropriate where a party fails to make discovery or to obey an order of court respecting discovery.” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• stating, “[d]iscovery sanctions are appropriate where a party fails to make discovery or to obey an order of court respecting discovery.” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• “Failure to conform with the requirements of rules of court is grounds for dismissal.” (cleaned up)
• “because the jury awarded identical damages for fraud as it did for breach of contract, we need not determine whether the evidence is sufficient to support the finding of both”
• “[W]hether a contract has the effect of a novation primarily depends upon the parties’ intent. The party asserting its existence bears the burden of demonstrating the parties had a meeting of the minds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).