State v. Addicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pro se defendant generally not entitled to special consideration on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DeFries v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-03-27· cited 29×
• Moody v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-12-16· cited 25×
• State v. Lindquist
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-15· cited 12×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-11· cited 10×
• State v. Wixom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 9×
• State v. Cervantes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-07· cited 6×
• State v. Lyon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-11· cited 3×
• State v. Shelton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-07-14
• Twitty v. Maass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-01-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Addicks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-02-28· cited 25×
• Miotke v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 14×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-02-08· cited 7×