State v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be unfair to require a party to comply with a pleading requirement which resulted from the Court’s interpretation of a statute, when the requirement did not exist at the time the party filed its pleading
• “The 60-day time period [in which to conduct a forfeiture hearing] does not commence to run until the filing of a sufficient answer, as determined by the requirements of OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3).” (punctuation omitted)
• “The 60-day time period [in which to conduct a forfeiture hearing] does not commence to run until the filing of a sufficient answer, as determined by the requirements of OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3).” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Andrews v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-11-17· cited 40×
• Knodel v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-08-15· cited 7×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-06· cited 7×
• Goodwin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-14· cited 6×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-02-23
• Tasha Reshaw Goodwin v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State of Ga. v. Alford
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-06-06· cited 49×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-30· cited 5×