State v. Adam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was error to admit photographs that were “strikingly similar to ones disapproved by the court in State v. Boyd, 216 Kan. 373”
• “There seems to be no probative value to Exhibit 7G. * * * [T]he heart has been pulled out of the chest cavity and cut open to show a cross-section.”
• instruction justified although evidence of provocation by defendant slim
• reversed and remanded for a new trial; photographs were similar to die ones disapproved in Boyd, there was little or no probative value to the photographs, and the photographs should not be submitted into evidence when the case was retried

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Drayton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-01· cited 44×
• State v. Holt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-05-31· cited 27×
• State v. Pennington
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-12-12· cited 19×
• State v. Kayborn Brown
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2014-04-11· cited 15×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-12-14· cited 10×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-08-06· cited 7×
• State v. Sherrer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-03-08· cited 7×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Boyd
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 87×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 47×
• State v. Beard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 32×
• State v. Nguyen
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-05-22· cited 31×
• State v. Myers
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 29×
• State v. Hunt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-04-21· cited 27×
• State v. Arteaga
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 25×
• State v. Hartfield
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-10-27· cited 21×
• State v. Sutton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-01-27· cited 20×