State v. Acklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of masks and ropes seized from defendants at time of arrest was error because there was no evidence linking the articles to the robbery with which the defendants were charged
• holding that admission of masks and ropes seized from defendants at time of arrest was error because there was no evidence linking the articles to the robbery with which the defendants were charged
• concluding masks and ropes seized from defendants’ car were unrelated to crime because ‘‘state offered no evidence to show that the defendants used the masks and rope in the commission of the robbery with which they were charged, or that they had contemplated their use in that robbery’’
• concluding masks and ropes seized from defendants’ car were unrelated to crime because ‘‘state offered no evidence to show that the defendants used the masks and rope in the commission of the robbery with which they were charged, or that they had contemplated their use in that robbery’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).