State v. Acebal
Citations
- 110 La. 129
- 34 So. 303
- 1903 La. LEXIS 602
Syllabus
<p>LARCENY — INDICTMENT—APPEAL—REVIEW.</p> <p>1. It is not the province of this Court to determine whether the jury were right or wrong in their determination of the issue of fact presented in the matter of the ownership of the stolen property.</p> <p>2. It is rather as part of the description and to identify the stolen things, that an indictment is required to name the owner. Hence, to lay the title in the ostensible or apparent owner suffices.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Plaintiffs administratively exhausted challenge to 2018 OPPS Rule
- “Plaintiffs are entitled to equitable relief. Fashioning that relief, however, requires supplemental briefing from the parties addressing the reliefs proper scope and implementation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.