State v. Abraham
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5600
Syllabus
Substantial impairment rape; voluntary intoxication; manifest weight of the evidence; remote testimony via Zoom; Confrontation Clause. Defendant's convictions for substantial impairment rape are affirmed. Evidence in the record showed that the victim was unable to consent to sexual activity because she was voluntarily intoxicated to the point of being substantial impairment. Evidence in the record also showed that the defendant knew or should have known this because he was with her and saw her stumbling, unable to stand on her own, vomiting, and passing out or falling asleep.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- State v. SelfOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 148×
- State v. ZehOhio Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 128×
- State v. WhitsettOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 110×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 2024-04-04· cited 24×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 12×
- State v. HartmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-05· cited 10×
- State v. ScruggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.