State v. Abercrombie
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4786
Syllabus
Motion to withdraw guilty plea abuse of discretion Peterseim factors scope of hearing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant-appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record demonstrates the court engaged in a full Crim.R. 11 colloquy, the defendant-appellant understood the rights he was waiving as well as the nature of the charges and possible penalties, he was represented by competent counsel during the plea, and the court gave the request the consideration it merited.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest BarkerTenth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 182×
- State v. NormanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 16×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-29· cited 8×
- State v. FarkoshOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.