Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/12/2004
State v. Abdullah
Citations
- 592 S.E.2d 344
- 357 S.C. 344
- 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the totality of the circumstances gave officers reasonable grounds from an objective standard for a search of the premises
- holding the totality of the circumstances gave officers reasonable grounds from an objective standard for a search of the premises with a goal of securing the scene against perpetrators
- holding “the reasonableness of the officers’ conduct may be further gleaned from the decision to secure a warrant to seize the contraband once the protective sweep was concluded and exigent circumstances unquestionably ceased to exist”
- stating it was improvident to presuppose that subduing the defendant foreclosed the officers’ objectively reasonable need to perform a protective sweep of the premises
- noting a protective sweep may be permitted under the exigent circumstances doctrine where there is a risk of danger to police
- noting law enforcement may enter a dwelling \to prevent a suspect from fleeing or where there is a risk of danger to police or others inside or outside [the] dwelling\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Hearn, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-02-22· cited 60×
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 58×
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-21· cited 57×
- State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. PreslarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 33×
- State v. KirtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 15×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-12· cited 14×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 14×
- State v. CountsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-07-08· cited 14×
- State v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-12-19· cited 9×
- State v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-09-02· cited 9×
- State v. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-07-12· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-06-30· cited 4×
- Horry County v. ParbelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 3×
- State v. KotowskiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-05-15· cited 3×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,715×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 111×
- State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 66×
- State v. KhingratsaiphonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-12· cited 44×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-07-21· cited 41×
- State v. BultronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-04· cited 39×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-22· cited 30×
- State v. CulbreathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-05-12· cited 12×
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-06-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.