Skip to main content

State v. Abdullah

Citations

  • 592 S.E.2d 344
  • 357 S.C. 344
  • 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the totality of the circumstances gave officers reasonable grounds from an objective standard for a search of the premises
  • holding the totality of the circumstances gave officers reasonable grounds from an objective standard for a search of the premises with a goal of securing the scene against perpetrators
  • holding “the reasonableness of the officers’ conduct may be further gleaned from the decision to secure a warrant to seize the contraband once the protective sweep was concluded and exigent circumstances unquestionably ceased to exist”
  • stating it was improvident to presuppose that subduing the defendant foreclosed the officers’ objectively reasonable need to perform a protective sweep of the premises
  • noting a protective sweep may be permitted under the exigent circumstances doctrine where there is a risk of danger to police
  • noting law enforcement may enter a dwelling \to prevent a suspect from fleeing or where there is a risk of danger to police or others inside or outside [the] dwelling\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Hearn, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.