State v. Abdu

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5481

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress a second warrant for appellant's phone records, including cell site location data. The trial court did not commit plain error by admitting autopsy photos or by failing to instruct the jury on accomplice testimony pursuant to R.C. 2903.03(D). Additionally, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by imposing consecutive prison terms for three firearm specifications. Finally, appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court's judgment is affirmed.