State v. Abdisalan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that withdrawal was not appropriate when “[n]othing objectively in the record suggest[ed] that [the defendant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of [the] plea”
• concluding, based on those reasons, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plea- withdrawal motion
• affirming district court’s decision to deny plea-withdrawal under the fair-and-just standard where “[n]othing objectively in the record suggests that [defendant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of his plea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).