State v. Aakash A. Dalal (075325)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting there is no bright- line rule for determining whether a judge acted partially
• \[A] defendant's outburst in the middle of a trial . . . might reasonably be seen as an attempt to thwart the orderly administration of justice and would not necessarily call for recusal.\
• where the defendant was indicted for terroristic threats against two judges in the vicinage, and the Court ordered either a transfer of venue or that a judge from another vicinage try the case
• collecting authority from the Second, Third, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits
• \Bias cannot be inferred from adverse rulings against a party.\
• discussing standards for recusal of state court judges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).