State v. a House & 1.37 Acres of Real Property Located at 392 South 600 East

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining whether forfeiture was excessive under Eighth Amendment, apparently for correctness, although not specifically stating standard of review
• Court refused to address issue concerning testimony objected to on different grounds at trial than those raised on appeal
• \`forfeiture statutes historically have been understood as serving not simply remedial goals but also those of punishment and deterrence.'\
• “ ‘forfeiture statutes historically have been understood as serving not simply remedial goals but also those of punishment and deterrence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).