State v. A. A. La Fountain, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inability to state precisely why product was inoperable did not prevent lay testimony that product was inoperable but, rather, was \proper material for effective cross-examination\
• holding that inability to state precisely why product was inoperable did not prevent lay testimony that product was inoperable but, rather, was \proper material for effective cross-examination\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).