State v. $7,139.00 U.S. Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that competent counsel could decline to object to allegedly inadmissible testimony in an effort to 26 “support[ ] counsel’s strategy of incriminating” someone other than the appellant
• “[A] defendant cannot be convicted for merely being associated with a gang that commits criminal acts; the defendant must personally commit an enumerated offense himself.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).