State v. $107,156 U.S. Currency Seized, from Marlin Morton & Richard Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that General Statutes of Connecticut § 14-227a(h)(3) (2014
• “Honest disagreement about the interpretation of a statutory provision does not, however, make the statute ambiguous or vague.”
• “Honest disagreement about the interpretation of a statutory provision does not, however, make the statute ambiguous or vague.”
• “in enacting Public Acts 1985, No. 85-387 so as to amend § 14-227a, the legislature clearly intended to provide harsher penalties for offenders with a history of driving under the influence”
• courts should not apply \ordinary meaning\ if context dictates otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).