State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Grunstad Shipping Corp. (Belgium) N.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the rationale behind the specificity and notice requirements “loses its fdrce when the party resisting arbitration was a signatory to a charter party .:.”
• where the carrier itself was a party to the charter and had full notice of its terms, the court refused to permit it to claim benefits resulting from the failure of the bill of lading to identify the charterparty by date and identity of its signatories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).