State, Taxicab Authority v. Greenspun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court order remanding to the State of Nevada Taxicab Authority to consider evidence it initially refused to consider was not an appealable final judgrnent because it did not finally resolve the question presented
• concluding that a district court order remanding to the Nevada Taxicab Authority to consider evidence it previously did not consider was not a final judgment where that order did not resolve the merits of the underlying application or the Authority's decision
• stating that the district court’s order of remand to an administrative agency to consider evidence it initially refused to review was not appealable as a final judgment
• order reversing agency's decision and remanding for the agency to consider evidence it wrongfully refused to consider was not a final judgment
• district court did not review the merits of the agency's decision
• rejecting adoption of the collateral order doctrine for Nevada

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).